Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol 158, Issue 12 1625-1631, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Medical Association

Review * Synthèse

Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope -- if we can just get all the players onside

J. Frank, S. Sinclair, S. Hogg-Johnson, H. Shannon, C. Bombardier, D. Beaton and D. Cole

Despite the publication in the mid-1990s of comprehensive practice guidelines for the management of acute low-back pain, both in the United States and elsewhere, this ubiquitous health problem continues to be the main cause of workers' compensation claims in much of the Western world. This paper represents a synthesis of the intervention studies published in the last 4 years and is based on a new approach to categorizing these studies that emphasizes the stage or phase of back pain at the time of intervention and the site or agent of the intervention. Current thinking suggests that medical management in the first 3-4 weeks after the onset of pain should be generally conservative. Several studies of rather heterogeneous interventions focusing on return to work and implemented in the subacute stage (3-4 to 12 weeks after the onset of pain) have shown important reductions in time lost from work (by 30% to 50%). There is substantial evidence indicating that employers who promptly offer appropriately modified duties can reduce time lost per episode of back pain by at least 30%, with frequent spin-off effects on the incidence of new back-pain claims as well. Finally, newer studies of guidelines-based approaches to back pain in the workplace suggest that a combination of all these approaches, in a coordinated workplace-linked care system, can achieve a reduction of 50% in time lost due to back pain, at no extra cost and, in some settings, with significant savings.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. P. Cohen, C. Nguyen, S. G. Kapoor, V. C. Anderson-Barnes, L. Foster, C. Shields, B. McLean, T. Wichman, and A. Plunkett Back Pain During War: An Analysis of Factors Affecting Outcome Arch Intern Med, November 9, 2009; 169(20): 1916 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Waddell Preventing incapacity in people with musculoskeletal disorders Br. Med. Bull., October 5, 2006; (2006) ldl008v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A K Mortelmans, P Donceel, D Lahaye, and S Bulterys Does enhanced information exchange between social insurance physicians and occupational physicians improve patient work resumption? A controlled intervention study Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2006; 63(7): 495 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A Kennedy, M. Manno, S. Hogg-Johnson, T. Haines, L. Hurley, D. McKenzie, and D. E Beaton Prognosis in Soft Tissue Disorders of the Shoulder: Predicting Both Change in Disability and Level of Disability After Treatment Physical Therapy, July 1, 2006; 86(7): 1013 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Mortelmans, P. Donceel, and D. Lahaye Disability management through positive intervention in stakeholders' information asymmetry. A pilot study Occup. Med., March 1, 2006; 56(2): 129 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Abasolo, M. Blanco, J. Bachiller, G. Candelas, P. Collado, C. Lajas, M. Revenga, P. Ricci, P. Lazaro, M. D. Aguilar, et al. A Health System Program To Reduce Work Disability Related to Musculoskeletal Disorders Ann Intern Med, September 20, 2005; 143(6): 404 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Coggon, C. Martyn, K. T Palmer, and B. Evanoff Assessing case definitions in the absence of a diagnostic gold standard Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2005; 34(4): 949 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J B Staal, H Hlobil, M W van Tulder, G Waddell, A K Burton, B W Koes, and W van Mechelen Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: an international comparison Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2003; 60(9): 618 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Hogg-Johnson and D C Cole Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2003; 60(4): 244 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Loisel, J Lemaire, S Poitras, M-J Durand, F Champagne, S Stock, B Diallo, and C Tremblay Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six year follow up study Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2002; 59(12): 807 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M Fritz and S. Z George Identifying Psychosocial Variables in Patients With Acute Work-Related Low Back Pain: The Importance of Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Physical Therapy, October 1, 2002; 82(10): 973 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Cole, M. V. Mondloch, and S. Hogg-Johnson Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes -- a prospective study Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 1, 2002; 166(6): 749 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Etlin Neck pain Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 1, 2002; 166(1): 16 - 16. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Wing Rheumatology: 13. Minimizing disability in patients with low-back pain Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 1, 2001; 164(10): 1459 - 1468. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Borg, G. Hensing, and K. Alexanderson Predictive factors for disability pension -- An 11-year follow up of young persons on sick leave due to neck, shoulder, or back diagnoses Scand J Public Health, April 1, 2001; 29(2): 104 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Campolieti and J. N. Lavis The silent payer speaks: workers' compensation boards and Canadian physicians Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 1, 2000; 162(8): 1152 - 1153. [Full Text] [PDF]

HOME	CURRENT ISSUE	PAST ISSUES	COLLECTIONS	HELP	SEARCH
Copyright 1995-1998, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p) All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.